On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Fabrice PICCINALI <f.piccin...@fazae.com> wrote: > And what about pear ? > pear install zeta > It is well-know, easy to use and you can have your custom depot.
I always have problems with pear and would have no problem if it would go over Styx - so sooner, so better. > > > On 04/11/2011 11:02, Christian Grobmeier wrote: >> >> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Henri Bergius<henri.berg...@iki.fi> >> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Christian Grobmeier<grobme...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> But it seems, there is less interest. Don't know whats wrong, but it >>>> seems the PHP world is overloaded with frameworks. It seems, even a >>>> high quality framework as Zeta does suffer from this fact. >>> >>> In general, PHP has too many frameworks, and too few reusable >>> libraries. I think for AZC it would be better to position itself as a >>> managed collection of high-quality libraries than to try and position >>> as a framework. After all, Zeta components can already be used outside >>> of Zeta-managed framework code (for example, both Midgard MVC and >>> Symfony2 have integrations with the Workflows component). >> >> +1 >> >> A similar project is commons.apache.org. It works very well. >> >>> Which brings me to another point I wanted to take up. How about >>> packaging and distributing AZC through the new Composer system? That >>> would make the Zeta components quite accessible and easy to depend on: >>> http://bergie.iki.fi/blog/composer_solves_the_php_code-sharing_problem/ >> >> Sounds very interesting. Will follow this project >> >> Cheers >> Christian >> >> >>>> Christian >>> >>> /Henri >>> >>> -- >>> Henri Bergius >>> Motorcycle Adventures and Free Software >>> http://bergie.iki.fi/ >>> >>> Jabber: henri.berg...@gmail.com >>> Microblogs: @bergie >>> >> > -- http://www.grobmeier.de
