As I mentioned, ZFS is still BETA, so there are (and likely will be) some issues turn up with compatibility with the upper layers of the system if that's what you're referring to. But we're working hard on fixing these as they come up. So end goal is there shouldn't be any weird compatibility issues with the rest system.
Noel On Jan 9, 2008, at 2:38 PM, Scott Laird wrote: > On Jan 9, 2008 11:26 AM, Noël Dellofano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> As soon as I get in to work and can backup my sparsebundle to a >>> spare >>> MBP, I'm going to start banging on it. >> >> Sweet deal :) >> >>> So, do you have all of /Users on zfs, just one account, have you >>> tried >>> a FileVaulted account too? Or is that just crazy talk? :-) >> >> I currently just have one account, my personal one, to use ZFS. Then >> I just have another local admin account that uses HFS+ that I don't >> really use for anything except occasional testing. In my current >> setup, I created a pool, and I have 2 filesystems in it, one of which >> is my home directory. Then I just created my account and pointed it >> to use that directory for my home dir. >> I haven't experimented with File Vault yet at all, so feel free to >> have at it. Hopefully when we get encryption for ZFS then we'll be >> able to just offer it natively that way. > > So Leopard is able to use ZFS without any of the weird compatibility > problems that used to plague UFS users? > > > Scott _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
