Erik Trimble wrote:
Neal Pollack wrote:
On 07/ 1/09 05:11 AM, Haudy Kazemi wrote:
Ian Collins wrote:
Or run your systems of DC and get as much backup as you have room (and budget!) for batteries. I once visited a central exchange with 48 hours of battery capacity...

The way Google handles UPSes is to have a small 12v battery integrated with each PC power supply. When the machine is on, the battery has its charged maintained. Not unlike a laptop in that it has a built in battery backup, but using an inexpensive sealed lead acid battery instead of lithium ion. Here is info along with photos of the Google server internals:
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-10209580-92.html
http://willysr.blogspot.com/2009/04/googles-server-design.html

which is of course why people claim that google is less green than detroit :-)

Each sealed lead-acid battery is good for about 2 years in those power supplies.
Goodle uses more than 10,000 servers, many more.
Do the math. That's many many tons of lead and acid in the dump every 24 months.....

Yes, but...

Lead acid batteries are one of (if not _the_) the most-recycled items in the world. Something like 99.99% of all lead-acid batteries get fully recycled.
Lead acid batteries are one of the most recycled items, both because it makes economic sense and because it is a legal requirement. According to Google's published results, they are also have some of the most power efficient systems out there with 90%+ efficient 12v power supplies and great Power Usage Efficiency (PUE) numbers: http://www.greenm3.com/2009/04/insights-into-googles-pue-a-laptop-approach-to-power-supplies-and-ups-for-servers-achieves-999-efficient-ups-system.html

I'm not convinced by the argument that Google is less green than Detroit, and from the smiley it appears this statement was meant as tongue-in-cheek humor.

Personally, I don't like Google's solution. That's waaaay too many small batteries in everything. I'd be more in favor of something like a double marine battery every 2 racks. Lots more power, and those things are far easier to recondition and reuse - and much less labor intensive to install than 1 battery in 80+ servers.
With a good quality lead acid battery and appropriate charge management system, the battery can last the business life of the server without replacement (e.g. 4 years). In that case the batteries could be considered 'hands off' and would be replaced as a single unit along with the server. Google has talked about using commodity hardware vs. traditional server equipment, and here it looks like they have similar-to-commodity hardware optimized for efficiency via their leveraging of purchasing power (i.e. custom power supplies and OEM Gigabyte motherboards).

The experience people have with lead acid UPS batteries (and lithium phone and laptop batteries for that matter) dying in 2 years is primarily a function of poor quality batteries and/or poorly designed chargers that trickle charge the batteries to death. (Margins on official replacement batteries for UPSes, laptops and phones are high, leaving room in the market for refilled batteries and third party equivalents. There isn't much of an incentive to design in a good charging system.) The electric vehicle community knows this well and makes sure to use good charging and balancing systems to get their batteries to last for hundreds to thousands of cycles over several years (UPS systems don't need to cycle very often, but they do need deep cycle discharge capability). Some DIY electric vehicle enthusiasts successfully use batteries that in a former life served in UPSes but were revived. More on lead acid charging and care:
Charging Basics: http://www.evdl.org/pages/hartcharge.html
Care Basics: http://www.evdl.org/pages/hartbatt.html

All this said, I certainly do agree that the proper thing to do is move to full 12V DC inputs for all computers intended for data center use. Eliminating the need for non-12V (i.e. get rid of all the stuff that want 5V) on the internal components is really needed to make this efficient; that way, all you need in the way of a power supply is something that takes 48VDC input, and breaks up the leads into 12V outputs. Really cheap, really efficient. Having a nice 48VDC bus for the rack (like Telco) is much more energy efficient and far easier to hook something like a small UPS to...
I think it will be hard for 48v in 12v out DC/DC converters to compete in price and efficiency with a 240v AC input 12v DC out power supply that is 90%+ efficient (a quick Google search for 'power supply 95% efficient' finds models as well). 48v DC buses and batteries still need to be fed from a power supply of their own. Google's approach seems reasonable, assuming they have integrated a good battery charger/maintainer and are running off 240v AC.

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to