On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Chad Cantwell <c...@iomail.org> wrote: > No, this wasn't it. A non debug build with the same NIGHTLY_OPTIONS > at Rich Lowe's 142 build is still very slow... > > On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 09:52:10AM -0700, Chad Cantwell wrote: >> Yes, I think this might have been it. I missed the NIGHTLY_OPTIONS variable >> in >> opensolaris and I think it was compiling a debug build. I'm not sure what >> the >> ramifications are of this or how much slower a debug build should be, but I'm >> recompiling a release build now so hopefully all will be well. >> >> Thanks, >> Chad >> >> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 08:39:42AM +0100, Robert Milkowski wrote: >> > On 20/07/2010 07:59, Chad Cantwell wrote: >> > > >> > >I've just compiled and booted into snv_142, and I experienced the same >> > >slow dd and >> > >scrubbing as I did with my 142 and 143 compilations and with the Nexanta >> > >3 RC2 CD. >> > >So, this would seem to indicate a build environment/process flaw rather >> > >than a >> > >regression. >> > > >> > >> > Are you sure it is not a debug vs. non-debug issue? >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Robert Milkowski >> > http://milek.blogspot.com >> >
Could it somehow not be compiling 64-bit support? -- Brent Jones br...@servuhome.net _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
