On 10/19/2012 09:58 PM, Matthew Ahrens wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 5:29 AM, Arne Jansen <sensi...@gmx.net
> <mailto:sensi...@gmx.net>> wrote:
>     We have finished a beta version of the feature. A webrev for it
>     can be found here:
>     http://cr.illumos.org/~webrev/sensille/fits-send/
>     It adds a command 'zfs fits-send'. The resulting streams can
>     currently only be received on btrfs, but more receivers will
>     follow.
>     It would be great if anyone interested could give it some testing
>     and/or review. If there are no objections, I'll send a formal
>     webrev soon.
> Please don't bother changing libzfs (and proliferating the copypasta
> there) -- do it like lzc_send().

ok. It would be easier though if zfs_send would also already use the
new style. Is it in the pipeline already?

> Likewise, zfs_ioc_fits_send should use the new-style API.  See the
> comment at the beginning of zfs_ioctl.c.
> I'm not a fan of the name "FITS" but I suppose somebody else already
> named the format.  If we are going to follow someone else's format
> though, it at least needs to be well-documented.  Where can we find the
> documentation?
> FYI, #1 google hit for "FITS":  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FITS
> #3 hit:  http://code.google.com/p/fits/
> Both have to do with file formats.  The entire first page of google
> results for "FITS format" and "FITS file format" are related to these
> two formats.  "FITS btrfs" didn't return anything specific to the file
> format, either.

It's not too late to change it, but I have a hard time coming up with
some better name. Also, the format is still very new and I'm sure it'll
need some adjustments.


> --matt
> _______________________________________________
> zfs-discuss mailing list
> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

zfs-discuss mailing list

Reply via email to