On Jan 2, 2013, at 8:45 PM, Geoff Nordli <geo...@gnaa.net> wrote:
> I am looking at the performance numbers for the Oracle VDI admin guide.
> From my calculations for 200 desktops running Windows 7 knowledge user (15
> iops) with a 30-70 read/write split it comes to 5100 iops. Using 7200 rpm
> disks the requirement will be 68 disks.
> This doesn't seem right, because if you are using clones with caching, you
> should be able to easily satisfy your reads from ARC and L2ARC. As well,
> Oracle VDI by default caches writes; therefore the writes will be coalesced
> and there will be no ZIL activity.
All of these IOPS <--> VDI users guidelines are wrong. The problem is that the
response time is too great for a HDD. The only hope we have of getting the
calculations to work is to reduce the variability by using a device that is
more consistent in its
response (eg SSDs).
> Anyone have other guidelines on what they are seeing for iops with vdi?
The successful VDI implementations I've seen have relatively small space
the performance-critical work. So there are a bunch of companies offering
for that market. If you're stuck with HDDs, then effective use of
snapshots+clones with a few
GB of RAM and slog can support quite a few desktops.
zfs-discuss mailing list