> From: Richard Elling [mailto:richard.ell...@gmail.com]
> I disagree the ZFS is developmentally challenged. 

As an IT consultant, 8 years ago before I heard of ZFS, it was always easy to 
sell Ontap, as long as it fit into the budget.  5 years ago, whenever I told 
customers about ZFS, it was always a quick easy sell.  Nowadays, anybody who's 
heard of it says they don't want it, because they believe it's a dying product, 
and they're putting their bets on linux instead.  I try to convince them 
otherwise, but I'm trying to buck the word on the street.  They don't listen, 
however much sense I make.  I can only sell ZFS to customers nowadays, who have 
still never heard of it.

"Developmentally challenged" doesn't mean there is no development taking place. 
 It means the largest development effort is working closed-source, and not 
available for free (except some purposes), so some consumers are going to 
follow their path, while others are going to follow the open source branch 
illumos path, which means both disunity amongst developers and disunity amongst 
consumers, and incompatibility amongst products.  So far, in the illumos 
branch, I've only seen bugfixes introduced since zpool 28, no significant 
introduction of new features.  (Unlike the oracle branch, which is just as easy 
to sell as ontap).

Which presents a challenge.  Hence the term, "challenged."

Right now, ZFS is the leading product as far as I'm concerned.  Better than MS 
VSS, better than Ontap, better than BTRFS.  It is my personal opinion that one 
day BTRFS will eclipse ZFS due to oracle's unsupportive strategy causing 
disparity and lowering consumer demand for zfs, but of course, that's just a 
personal opinion prediction for the future, which has yet to be seen.  So far, 
every time I evaluate BTRFS, it fails spectacularly, but the last time I did, 
was about a year ago.  I'm due for a BTRFS re-evaluation now.

zfs-discuss mailing list
  • Re: [zfs-discuss]... Edward Harvey
    • Re: [zfs-dis... Richard Elling
      • Re: [zfs... Tim Cook
        • Re: ... Richard Elling
          • ... Robert Milkowski
            • ... Sašo Kiselkov
            • ... Edward Ned Harvey (opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris)
            • ... Richard Elling
          • ... Pasi Kärkkäinen
      • Re: [zfs... Edward Ned Harvey (opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris)
        • Re: ... Dan Swartzendruber
        • Re: ... Sašo Kiselkov
          • ... Edward Ned Harvey (opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris)
            • ... Sašo Kiselkov
          • ... Darren J Moffat
            • ... Tomas Forsman
              • ... Darren J Moffat
            • ... Sašo Kiselkov
              • ... Robert Milkowski
              • ... Sašo Kiselkov

Reply via email to