On 01/22/2013 05:00 PM, casper....@oracle.com wrote:
>> Some vendors call this (and thins like it) "Thin Provisioning", I'd say
>> it is more "accurate communication between 'disk' and filesystem" about
>> in use blocks.
> In some cases, users of disks are charged by bytes in use; when not using
> SCSI UNMAP, a set of disks used for a zpool will in the end be charged for
> the whole reservation; this becomes costly when your standard usage is
> much less than your peak usage.
> Thin provisioning can now be used for zpools as long as the underlying
> LUNs have support for SCSI UNMAP
Looks like an interesting technical solution to a political problem :D
zfs-discuss mailing list