Steven Montgomery wrote:
> The placement of U.S. Missiles in Turkey. At least that's the pat answer
> the leftists always give.
It's also the historical fact.
> This answer however, is similar to the one given
> for taking over the countries of eastern Europe--that they needed "buffer
> states" to prevent against western aggression and hides the fact that the
> USSR was an imperialistic country. The real reason the Soviets put
> missiles in Cuba is that is was part of their "expansionist" policies.
>
But NATO acted first -- how do you account for that, ideologically speaking? It's a
powerful ideology that can put Cuba *before* Turkey.
--
Marc A. Schindler
Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland
"The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling
short; but in setting our aim too low, and achieving our mark."
--Michelangelo Buonarroti
Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the author
solely; its contents do not necessarily reflect those of the author’s employer, nor
those of any organization with which the author may be associated.
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
/// ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at ///
/// http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html ///
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
==^^===============================================================
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^^===============================================================
