Gary, I agree with almost every point you've made here. So as not to 
make this solely a me-too post, let me add that when a writer (US 
citizen or alien) makes a statement like, "I love America but I hate 
Republicanism", that writer has shown himself to be duplicitous and 
untrustworthy. Any "good points" he goes on to make are then completely 
lost on me, because he has already proven himself a liar.


Gary Smith wrote:
> This is the problem with many liberal writers-they make statements from
> the heart, regardless of whether they back up their statements with
> facts, or if those facts are correct.
> First off, the president has shown himself not to be a "mental
> lightweight." Second, where is the evidence that Cheney is an "evil
> power", especially when no actual misdeeds have been shown at Haliburton
> Oil?  Third, Rumsfeld never was a senator, perhaps the author should try
> looking up in the dictionary the difference between Secretary of Defense
> and Attorney General????
> So, if anyone is a "lightweight" here, it is the author of the article.
> I know we USAmericans do have an enormous patriotism (at times), but we
> also have a lot of suspicion. Isn't it interesting that discussions on
> whether we should go to war with Iraq are right or not are going on in
> this country? A blind patriot wouldn't have such discussions going on. 
> As
> for "evil", I'll bet this guy still supports Clinton as a great
> president. And how about those Democratic senators involved in Enron and
> Global Crossing? Are they "evil" also? If you're going to call one 
> person
> evil, then you at least need to be consistent. Finally, show you've at
> least done some homework (who was this guy's copy editor, to let such
> slop slip through?), and get the facts straight.
> I'm a historian (among other trades), and I've not only seen Ken Burns'
> Civil War, but I've read several studies on it. yes, it was a tragedy.
> But massive deaths on both sides only shows the tragedy of war, not its
> justification. The North fought for union and to defeat slavery, while
> the South fought for states' rights and to keep their slaves. All very
> key issues for anyone calling himself an American. But a Canadian may 
> not
> fully understand that, as Canada has never had to struggle with slavery,
> states' rights, or a major fight to maintain its unity. It's kind of 
> like
> an American today not understanding poverty or slavery, because we just
> don't have it as drastic as other nations, unless they travel and live 
> in
> another place for some time and learn to appreciate it. I like what
> ex-Black Panther Eldridge Cleaver said when he returned from Russia,
> "there is more freedom in an American jail than on the streets of
> Moscow."
> Should cost only be counted in body bags? What is the total value of
> freedom from terror, or to maintain our sovereignty? Ten body bags?
> Twenty? One hundred? Or should we just curl up in a corner and accept 
> the
> idea that no amount of body bags are worth the cost of freedom.
> Americans do not honor war. Americans honor freedom and those who defend
> that great treasure, which only a minority of homo sapiens enjoy in this
> world.  Flags fly, because unlike the flags of other nations (including
> Canada's), ours represent our freedom and vision. It is a vision that 
> has
> endured since Thomas Jefferson inked those sacred words on a piece of
> parchment: "We hold these truths to be, liberty, and
> the pursuit of happiness."
> Few nations have made a love of freedom so innate with the human spirit
> as have Americans. This inspires some, and infuriates many who do not
> have the same vision. The French, who seek equality and brotherhood,
> cannot understand what real freedom is. This is why their revolution
> failed. Most nations do not have a Jefferson or a Thomas Paine. Few have
> men who are anything but "summer soldiers" that sneak home when the
> winter chill is in the air. Few have a group of men willing to sign 
> their
> death warrants on such a parchment as the Declaration of Independence, 
> or
> to truly seek that freedom for all men; allowing that freedom to expand
> to other groups not originally included, such as blacks and women. 
> Today,
> there are many nations that still have slaves, and that still treat 
> women
> like dogs. We stand as symbol which those nations hate. Should we be
> ashamed of the truth and light we've brought to the world? "A city on a
> hill cannot be hid, neither does one light a candle and place it under a
> bushel."
> Perhaps what irritates me most is liberal duplicity and using the Iraq
> war as an extension of their (and in this case, Canadian) vanity.
> K'aya K'ama,
> Gerald/gary  Smith    gszion1    http://www
> "No one is as hopelessly enslaved as the person who thinks he's free."  
> -
> Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
> Marc quoting article:
> On the other hand, we have the axis of Bush-Chaney-Rumsfeld. What a
> triumvirate. The President is a mental lightweight. The Vice President
> is the evil power behind the throne, the man who walked away from his
> insider misdeeds at Halliburton Oil. (Remember too that two of the three
> of the sacred triumvirate are oilmen.) Then  there is Rummy. He has
> visions of some kind of military sugarplums dancing in his head. He is
> and was a devout right-wing fundamentalist who lost his senate seat to a
> dead man's wife....Perhaps what irritates me most is that the Iraq war 
> is
> an extension of
> American vanity.

///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///      ///

This email was sent to:

Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!

Reply via email to