Here's another example of where John and I would agree, although perhaps for
different reasons. I don't think it has anything to do with George II's and
Cheney's membership in any secret organization, but rather because Cheney is more
powerful than the president and better connected (and more of a war hawk). I
sincerely believe George II's war-mongering talk will cease the day after the
mid-term elections, where Cheney really means it.

"John W. Redelfs" wrote:

> At 09:18 PM, Saturday, 10/26/02, Gary Smith wrote:
> >This is the problem with many liberal writers-they make statements from
> >the heart, regardless of whether they back up their statements with
> >facts, or if those facts are correct. First off, the president has shown
> >himself not to be a "mental lightweight." Second, where is the evidence
> >that Cheney is an "evil power", especially when no actual misdeeds have
> >been shown at Haliburton Oil?
> Cheney is a CFR insider.  That is baaaad.  Not only that he ranks George
> W.  He is a whole generation older.  If there were a serious disagreement
> between Bush and Cheney, Bush Sr. would reign in George W. because of
> Cheney's rank in the secret combination.
> Of course, I can't prove any of this.  But then I know a lot of things that
> I cannot prove.  The gospel is one of them.
> John W. Redelfs                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ===========================================
> "I don't think I'm alone when I say I'd like to see more
> and more planets fall under the ruthless domination of
> our solar system." --Jack Handy
> ===========================================
> All my opinions are tentative pending further data. --JWR
> /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
> ///      ///
> /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Marc A. Schindler
Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland

“We do not think that there is an incompatibility between words and deeds; the
worst thing is to rush into action before the consequences have been properly
debated…To think of the future and wait was merely another way of saying one was
a coward; any idea of moderation was just an attempt to disguise one’s unmanly
character; ability to understand a question from all sides meant that one was
totally unfitted for action.” – Pericles about his fellow-Athenians, as quoted by
Thucydides in “The Peloponessian Wars”

Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the author
solely; its contents do not necessarily reflect those of the author’s employer,
nor those of any organization with which the author may be associated.

///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///      ///

This email was sent to:

Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!

Reply via email to