I figured that if I added the France option, people would get the what I
thought to be obvious facetiousness, given John's well stated objection to
any preemptive strikes. (Of course, I don't think that they are preemptive,
but reasonable people can disagree; thus John and I can CLEARLY disagree!)
Stacy Smith wrote:
> Who says we should attack anybody?
> At 08:35 PM 11/06/2002 -0500, you wrote:
> >Who objected to Marc's obvious statement? The Taliban was put in power
> >people in Pakistan.
> >This is a real "Duh!". By the way, are you advocating that we attack
> >Pakistan first, and THEN Iraq? I have a better idea. First, we'll
> >Israel - that will completely fool the fake Islamists and we can sneak in
> >sucker punch at both Pakistan and Iraq when they are still in shock.
> >can come next.
> >John W. Redelfs wrote:
> > > http://www.guardian.co.uk/pakistan/Story/0,2763,834287,00.html
> > >
> > > It looks like Marc may be vindicated in his predictions that the
> > > will come to power in Pakistan. Why we are planning a war against
> > > when the Taliban is coming to power in a nation that already has
> > > weapons is a complete mystery to me.
/// ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at ///
/// http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html ///
This email was sent to: firstname.lastname@example.org
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!