This is a very interesting comment,a nd sheds a lot of light on the subject at
hand. We often try to read in our own modern, secular ideas of what *we* want the
truth to be, rather than letting the record speak for itself, and we're often
inconsistent. I have on my website a transcript of a talk by Daniel Ludlow when
he was MP in Perth, Australia, on this topic wrt the Book of Mormon. It makes for
interesting reading (here's a direct link to the beginning of the talk, in draft
form: http://www.members.shaw.ca/mschindler/C/bomarch.htm#C147)

Jim Cobabe wrote:

> This discussion by Stephen Robinson applies with equal validity to
> questions about the historical accuracy of the Bible...
>

--
Marc A. Schindler
Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland

“Man will occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of the time he will pick
himself up and continue on” – Winston Churchill

Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the author
solely; its contents do not necessarily reflect those of the author’s employer,
nor those of any organization with which the author may be associated.

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html      ///
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

==^^===============================================================
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^^===============================================================

Reply via email to