This is a very interesting comment,a nd sheds a lot of light on the subject at hand. We often try to read in our own modern, secular ideas of what *we* want the truth to be, rather than letting the record speak for itself, and we're often inconsistent. I have on my website a transcript of a talk by Daniel Ludlow when he was MP in Perth, Australia, on this topic wrt the Book of Mormon. It makes for interesting reading (here's a direct link to the beginning of the talk, in draft form: http://www.members.shaw.ca/mschindler/C/bomarch.htm#C147)
Jim Cobabe wrote: > This discussion by Stephen Robinson applies with equal validity to > questions about the historical accuracy of the Bible... > -- Marc A. Schindler Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland �Man will occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of the time he will pick himself up and continue on� � Winston Churchill Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the author solely; its contents do not necessarily reflect those of the author�s employer, nor those of any organization with which the author may be associated. ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// /// ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at /// /// http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html /// ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ==^^=============================================================== This email was sent to: [email protected] EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2 Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^^===============================================================
