John, I am willing to answer, and defend, but first answer the question that
we have been discussing.  Are we in "general" agreement as to what
constitutes a Moral War?

If so then we can apply the test and come up with a satisfactory conclusion.
If not, then why bother? as discussion will not be possible!


----- Original Message -----
From: "John W. Redelfs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 10:53 AM
Subject: Re: [ZION] Moral War

> George Cobabe favored us with:
> >The question was asked by one, is it not possible for both sides to fight
> >a moral war?  No, it is not!!!  We must only fight after we have done all
> >we can to prevent a war.  If both sides are trying to do this, war will
> >not occur.  Moral action by both parties will always result in peace.
> >war to occur one or both must be acting immorally.
> What do you think, George?  Is the coming war with Iraq a fight between
> moral party ad one immoral party?  Or is it a fight between two immoral
> parties?
> John W. Redelfs                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ===========================================
> "Atheistic humanism is the opiate of the self-described
> intellectuals" --Uncle Bob
> ===========================================
> All my opinions are tentative pending further data. --JWR
> ///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
> ///      ///

///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///      ///

This email was sent to:

Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!

Reply via email to