You didn't describe your purpose. While your footnotes may support what you claim -- as I recall you provide a bibliography, not traditional footnotes -- it requires the reader to assume you've interpreted the source material correctly and that the source material supports what you say. I think it's wiser, more compelling, to provide a summary quote or two with an appropriate footnote.
Just like they do in TIME Magazine, Jonathan. <LOL> --JWR
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// /// ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at /// /// http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html /// ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// --^---------------------------------------------------------------- This email was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2 Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For Topica's complete suite of email marketing solutions visit: http://www.topica.com/?p=TEXFOOTER --^----------------------------------------------------------------
