Tim Peters wrote at 2005-9-21 18:03 -0400: > ... >OTOH, if >we view the after-commit hook as running at the very start of "the next" >transaction, the implementation becomes harder to picture (although the edge >case semantics become clearer: the after-commit hooks run "in" a >well-defined transaction then).
But it would give very strange semantics: A transactions has something at its beginning, it knows nothing about -- and this is committed or aborted depending on the fate of this transaction. Bound to result in big surprises... -- Dieter _______________________________________________ For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki: http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev
