Tim Peters wrote at 2005-9-21 18:03 -0400:
> ...
>OTOH, if
>we view the after-commit hook as running at the very start of "the next"
>transaction, the implementation becomes harder to picture (although the edge
>case semantics become clearer:  the after-commit hooks run "in" a
>well-defined transaction then).

But it would give very strange semantics:

  A transactions has something at its beginning, it knows nothing
  about -- and this is committed or aborted depending on the
  fate of this transaction.

  Bound to result in big surprises...

For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:

ZODB-Dev mailing list  -  ZODB-Dev@zope.org

Reply via email to