Am Donnerstag, den 13.10.2005, 18:09 -0400 schrieb Jim Fulton: > Tino Wildenhain wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, den 13.10.2005, 08:03 +0200 schrieb Andreas Jung: > > > >>--On 13. Oktober 2005 01:45:30 -0400 Chris Spencer > >><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > >>>I noticed that if a ZEOServer client doesn't have the definition for an > >>>object's class, it loads it as a broken object. Is there any way to fix > >>>the broken object by obtaining the class source from the server? > >>> > >> > >>Your sources on the client side must be complete. Otherwise the object is > >>broken. The server has nothing to do with problem. Fix your client. > > > > > > While it would certainly be nice if the ZEO server could deliver > > codeobjects too. > > > I don't think it would be useful to deliver ordinary Python modules > via the DB.
Why not? This way one could keep all code changes in a central repository, w/o the need of either manually syncing or some special (flaky) network filesystem. > It would be useful to support persistent modules, which would have > somewhat different semantics than standard Python modules. > There is limited experimental support for this in the Zope 3 repository. Another usecase and valid too - this way one could do an entire timetravel with code, data and objects in the ZODB. SVN made right, so to say :) > > > In Theory and with much much bad hackery (overwriting > > __import__ and friends) it could be possible. Jim? > > For some definition of "it", sure. Btw, (hijacking the thread because a bit related) how can I serialize the state of a generator object? (e.g. for caching it between requests) Pickle does not work for it (whyever) Regards Tino _______________________________________________ For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki: http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev