Jeremy Hylton wrote:
> It has been possible to inherit from dictionary since Python 2.2, but
> it is not possible for a persistent object and it would not do what
> you expect even if it were possible. A persistent object has a custom
> C layout and so does dict, so it is not possible to have them both as
> base classes. (TypeError: multiple bases have instance lay-out
> conflict. (I don't know why there is a hypen in lay-out.)) If it
> were possible, it wouldn't work anyway. If you inherit from dict and
> override its builtin methods, like __setitem__, your overridden method
> will be ignored by C code using methods like PyDict_SetItem().
Thanks for the explanation.
> On the other hand, I think that this omission is just an oversight. It
> would probably be a good idea to change PersistentDict/Mapping to use
> the DictMixin instead of UserDict.
I'd have to take a look at the mixin before I can come up with an educated
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org