Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
in memory. Dieter estimates 20% to 35% slowdown for the C algorithms
(whatever that means), Tim seems to think it won't have such a big
effect. I guess we'll only know after some benchmarks.
Can we please not make any definite decisions until this issue has been
resolved, some of us do actually care about performance ;-)
Yes, ideally, I'd like to see just IIBTree's but only if there are not
perfomance implications. I think BTrees sit low enough in the stack that
it's perfectly justifiable to have both an I BTree and an L BTree.
If having two isn't acceptable, then why do we have an I and O BTree's,
not to mention the special ones used for in-memory ZODB indexes? Surely
we should just have one BTree class?
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
_______________________________________________
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/
ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev
