Chris Withers wrote at 2006-4-18 08:34 +0100:
>If having two isn't acceptable, then why do we have an I and O BTree's,
>not to mention the special ones used for in-memory ZODB indexes? Surely
>we should just have one BTree class?
Using "I" versus "O" BTrees makes a huge difference for mass operations
(as those used for cataloguing and set operations).
The difference is surely much smaller for "I" versus "L" BTrees -- but
it will be measurable for many catalog searches.
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org