On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 15:08 -0500, Jim Fulton wrote: > On Nov 6, 2007, at 3:01 PM, Roché Compaan wrote: > > > On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 17:40 -0200, Sidnei da Silva wrote: > >>> Despite this change there are still a huge amount > >>> of unexplained calls to the 'persistent_id' method of the > >>> ObjectWriter > >>> in serialize.py. > >> > >> Why 'unexplained'? 'persistent_id' is called from the Pickler > >> instance > >> being used in ObjectWriter._dump(). It is called for each and every > >> single object reachable from the main object, due to the way Pickler > >> works (I believe). Maybe persistent_id can be analysed and optimized > >> for the most common cases? > >> > > > > If you look at the profiler stats I posted earlier you would have > > noticed that there was about 1.3 million calls to persistent_id while > > only 20000 objects were persisted. So if it is being called for each > > object I would expect a figure closer to 20000, not 1.3 million. > > What am > > I missing? > > It's called for *all* objects, not just persistent objects. This > includes, ints, strings (including attribute names), etc.
Aaaaah. Man that lightbulb is burning my brain ;-) -- Roché Compaan Upfront Systems http://www.upfrontsystems.co.za _______________________________________________ For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki: http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev
