On Wednesday, May 08, 2013 12:34:00 PM Tres Seaver wrote: > > I do not care whether this happens for ZODB 4.0 or 4.1 as long as I > > get some commitment that 4.1 > > Chris and I chatted with Jim about this over beers last Friday. I > explained that the current 'py3; branch does not require the 'zodbpickle > everywhere' stuff (the Python2 side doesn't use 'zodbpickle'). Jim then > agreed that we could merge that branch before releasing 4.0. We will > need to add some caveats to the docs / changelog (Python3 support is only > for new applications, no forward- / backward-compatibility for data, etc.) > > Given that ZODB won't import or use 'zodbpickle' under Python2, I don't > think we need to remove the current Python2 support (as released in > 0.4.1): the Python3 version (with noload()) has been there all along.
Sounds great, thanks! Regards, Stephan -- Entrepreneur and Software Geek Google me. "Zope Stephan Richter" _______________________________________________ For more information about ZODB, see http://zodb.org/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev