On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 03:36:56PM +0100, Dick Davies wrote: > On 23/08/06, Jerry Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Dick Davies wrote: > >>> On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 01:03:40PM +0100, Gary Pennington wrote: > >> > >>> > On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 02:13:51AM -0700, UNIX admin wrote: > >> ... > >>> > Zone packages end up needing other packages, which end up needing > >>> the SUNWj5rt package, > >>> > > >>> > SUNWj5rt needs a whole bunch of X-windows packages, such as > >>> SUNWxwplt and the like, > >> > >> > >>> It is fixed in Nevada. > >>> Take a look at: > >> ... > >>> http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=5063672 > >> > >> There doesn't seem to be any description of *how* this was fixed. > >> I'd assumed 'dynamic resource pools' no longer depended on java > >> (wrongly, judging by SXCR b46). > > > >In S10 there was a single pkg for pools (SUNWpool). In nevada this > >was split into two pkgs (SUNWpool & SUNWpoold). SUNWzoneu still > >depends on SUNWpool, but if you look at that pkg, it no longer > >depends on SUNWj5rt. The SUNWpoold pkg does depend on SUNWj5rt. > > That makes sense - I thought the OP was asking to remove the > 'dynamic resource pools' dependency on java. > > Thanks. > > -- > Rasputin :: Jack of All Trades - Master of Nuns > http://number9.hellooperator.net/ > _______________________________________________ > zones-discuss mailing list > zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
The split of the pools functionality into multiple packages made sense for zones. The functionality provided by dynamic resource pools only applies to the global zone anyway. For the curious amongst you... We can't remove the dependency on java from Dynamic Resource Pools, without re-writing poold, since it is written in java. Gary -- Gary Pennington Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsystems [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
