That's great Patrick, thanks!

On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:

> I marked it for 3.4.0, that ok with you? We are all hunkered down at this
> point trying to wrap everything up for the 3/10 3.3.0 deadline. I marked
> 3.4.0 (should come out relatively soon after 3.3.0, 3/4 months say) so that
> we have enough time to vet it before exposing potential users (which makes
> it more difficult for example to make changes to the API).
>
> Patrick
>
>
> Aaron Crow wrote:
>
>> Thanks Patrick. I submitted a patch:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-679
>>
>> Looking forward to any feedback...
>>
>> All the best,
>> Aaron
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>  Originally the c/java apis "grew up as sibilings" so there wasn't much
>>> attempt to make the java very OO friendly. What you are suggesting makes
>>> sense, and my personal thought is that if done correctly could "graduate"
>>> to
>>> main at some point (prolly as a complement to the current api, but lets
>>> start with contrib and see where it goes from there).
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Patrick
>>>
>>> Aaron Crow wrote:
>>>
>>>  Hi Patrick,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks! I took a look at zkclient. Since, as you say, it's not very well
>>>> documented, I'm not 100% clear on the goals of the project. However, I
>>>> did
>>>> see that ZooKeeper nodes are described with (String)path throughout, so
>>>> that
>>>> tells me that zkclient hasn't adopted the first-class "Node" design I'm
>>>> proposing. I think, if the "Node" design was found useful by people AND
>>>> the
>>>> same people found zkclient useful, there would be some integration
>>>> possibilities so that the two could work hand-in-hand.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks again for your reply, and thanks in advance for any further
>>>> guidance
>>>> or thoughts...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> All the best,
>>>> Aaron
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  This sounds pretty useful as a contrib, ff to submit a patch
>>>>
>>>>> http://bit.ly/bgYpW5 . Be sure to include README type details on
>>>>> semantics
>>>>> of use (I don't see watches so this might be pretty simple).
>>>>>
>>>>> Also see: http://bit.ly/bhcpwx a few ZK users are using this now
>>>>> afaict.
>>>>> However last I checked docs were thin and there def. were some issues
>>>>> with
>>>>> the semantics.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Aaron Crow wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  Dear ZooKeepers,
>>>>>
>>>>>> We recently integrated ZooKeeper into our Java project at work. This
>>>>>> is
>>>>>> a
>>>>>> very cool project... I feel like a kid with a new toy. After using the
>>>>>> Java
>>>>>> API a little, I've begun to create some simple wrappers around the
>>>>>> main
>>>>>> ZooKeeper object.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Specifically, I'm creating a simple Node design, that makes it simpler
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> more convenient for me to do simple management of my ZooKeeper node
>>>>>> state.
>>>>>> Just as a rough idea:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Node node = myZk.getNode(path);
>>>>>> if(node.exists()){
>>>>>>  String data = node.getData();
>>>>>>  Collection<Node> children = node.getChildren();
>>>>>>  node.delete();
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I was wondering... am I re-inventing the wheel here (did I miss any
>>>>>> existing
>>>>>> API like this)? Or if not, would the community have any interest if I
>>>>>> wanted
>>>>>> to add this into the main project?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Many thanks in advance for any insights or guidance...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> All the best,
>>>>>> Aaron
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>

Reply via email to