Hi Dr Hao,

If you think this is not a configuration issue, then it would be a good idea
to open a jira. Thanks.

On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Dr Hao He <h...@softtouchit.com> wrote:
>
> > hi, Ted,
> >
> > I am a little bit confused here.  So, is the node inconsistency problem
> > that Vishal and I have seen here most likely caused by configurations or
> > embedding?
> >
> > If it is the former, I'd appreciate if you can point out where those
> silly
> > mistakes have been made and the correct way to embed ZK.
> >
>
> I think it is likely due to misconfiguration, but I don't know what the
> issue is exactly.  I think that another poster suggested that you ape the
> normal ZK startup process more closely.  That sounds good but it may be
> incompatible with your goals of integrating all configuration into a single
> XML file and not using the normal ZK configuration process.
>
> Your thought about forking ZK is a good one since there are calls to
> System.exit() that could wreak havoc.
>
>
>
> > Although I agree with your comments about the architectural issues that
> > embedding may lead to and we are aware of those,  I do not agree that
> > embedding will always lead to those issues.
>
>
> I agree that embedding won't always lead to those issues and your
> application is a reasonable counter-example.  As is common, I think that
> the
> exception proves the rule since your system is really just another way to
> launch an independent ZK cluster rather than an example of ZK being
> embedded
> into an application.
>

Reply via email to