We use CMF 1.6 branch with GS 1.2 branch in Plone 2.5. This, and
itchy fingers, made me update the external.
FWIW, when I check out CMF/tags/1.6.2 I expect to get a GS tag as
well. When I check out CMF/branches/1.6 I expect to get the HEADs of
the respective development branches.
Another benefit would be that nightly tests also use branch HEADs,
catching discrepancies early on. We use this policy in Plone-world to
general satisfaction.
Stefan
On 27. Nov 2006, at 15:08, yuppie wrote:
I'm fine with requiring tagged GS releases for CMF *releases*. But
sometimes it is useful to link unreleased CMF branches to
unreleased GenericSetup versions. This helps to avoid problems
caused by stitching in new versions right before a release.
--
It doesn't necessarily do it in chronological order, though.
--Douglas Adams
_______________________________________________
Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf
See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests
