-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hi Tres!
> Tres Seaver wrote:
>> yuppie wrote:
>>> But that code doesn't improve the non-purging mode. The changes Wichert
>>> proposed make sense with or without the 'upgrade steps' feature.
>> If we had the upgrade machinery in place, we could scrap non-purging
>> mode altogether -- its purpose is to allow for "controlled" application
>> of changes to existing configuration without full replacement.
>> Wichert's rationale was specifically:
>>> The particular reason I'm interested in this is that for Plone we are
>>> playing with using GenricSetup profiles as part of the migration code.
>>> This means we can write a lot less python code but just write changes
>>> as profile snippets.
> Well. If we don't use the non-purging mode we can't write changes as
> profile snippets. Should upgrade steps always be implemented in pure
> Python without using any XML files?
I would say that the "execute-while-parse" model of our current profile
import driver is wrong for upgrades, but it would be possible. The
upgrade step could do the checking that a given "upgrade-only" extension
should be imported, and then import it (perhaps passing 'no_purge' as a
Meanwhile, we would disable / remove any UI for setting that flag
outside an upgrade.
> BTW: Are there any unit tests for the upgrade steps feature?
I'll defer to Rob: he was porting the code from the CPS add-on.
>>> CMF 2.1 beta has some serious site manager issues. Please let's focus on
>>> resolving these issues first.
>> I'm really just lobbying to have the GS work tested and merged. Fixing
>> ths LSM stuff is in the hands of a different set of folks, I think.
>> Rob, how did stuff go at Sorrento?
> The CMF 2.1 branch is not as stable as it should be. Adding the 'upgrade
> steps' feature might be low risk, but the other changes on the sprint
> branch look more risky to me. I'm a bit afraid merging them will
> destabilize the 2.1 branch further.
I don't think so. The other changes split out the UI for setting the
baseline profile (ordinarily done only at site creation) and showing
available extensions. I think the cleanup there is highly unlikely to
cause instability: the only change is that we no longer require (or
even allow) people to set extension profiles as "faux" baselines in
order to import them.
Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v220.127.116.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org
See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests