Martin Aspeli, on 2007-07-31: > Of course, there may be a good reason to have cache.xml not be processed if > CacheFu isn't installed, but it's still unpredictable. The only way I can > make it predictable would be if I explicitly declared a dependency on this > profile and/or I explicitly declared a dependency on the product that > provided it.
Is there anything wrong with declaring CacheFu a dependency when you actually depend on it? And on the other hand: if you have a cache.xml file in e.g. Poi and someone else uses that product but does not want to use CacheFu, then without declaring a dependency the cache.xml just does not get processed, which is exactly what the user wants then. -- Maurits van Rees | http://maurits.vanrees.org/ [NL] Work | http://zestsoftware.nl/ "Do not worry about your difficulties in computers, I can assure you mine are still greater." _______________________________________________ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests
