Martin Aspeli writes: > Yuppie writes: >> but in general that's the way to go. Since z3c.form became the >> standard in the Zope 3 world I'd like to see Zope 2 and CMF moving >> in the same direction. Unfortunately using plone.z3cform is no >> option for CMF because it has a different license and >> repository. *If* Plone wants to donate that code to the Zope >> Foundation or someone writes something similar (maybe five.z3cform), >> I'd be happy to help with CMF integration. > > Bah, I hate these discussions. I'm sure Daniel Nouri would be happy to > relicense. Re-invention for the sake of a license is just too dumb. > > I'd prefer to keep the name to avoid breaking existing packages, though. > > Another option is to factor out a few things to a five.z3cform and > have plone.z3cform import from it as appropriate.
I just relicensed and moved plone.z3cform to the Zope repository: http://svn.zope.org/plone.z3cform/trunk/ Despite the "plone" namespace, it works fine in CMF and pure Zope 2. *Some* of the functionality (modules) is Plone or CMF specific. The default configure.zcml aims to be usable without Plone or CMF. There's a buildout.cfg in there that pulls Plone. I'd like to replace it with a Zope2-only one (and maybe move the existing buildout to another location). The tests work without Plone. Daniel _______________________________________________ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests