Previously Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
> On Sep 23, 2008, at 17:01 , Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > Currently CMFCore and zope.dublincore duplicate some of the DC
> > interfaces. zope.dublincore even has an ICMFDublinCore interface
> > explicitly dublicing CMFCore's version.
> >
> > Are there any objections to making the CMFCore interfaces derived
> > classes from zope.dublincore, or possibly even using those directly
> > where possible?
> Do you see any specific benefit, more than just "replace our code with  
> other code to shift the maintenance burden"?

I found myself writing some code which needs to get dublin core data from
content and should work for both zope3 and zope2 applications, except
for the difference in interfaces.


Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>    It is simple to make things.                   It is hard to make things simple.
Zope-CMF maillist  -

See for bug reports and feature requests

Reply via email to