Previously Jens Vagelpohl wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > On Sep 23, 2008, at 19:19 , Wichert Akkerman wrote: > > > Previously Jens Vagelpohl wrote: > >> On Sep 23, 2008, at 17:01 , Wichert Akkerman wrote: > >> > >>> Are there any objections to making the CMFCore interfaces derived > >>> classes from zope.dublincore, or possibly even using those directly > >>> where possible? > >> > >> Do you see any specific benefit, more than just "replace our code > >> with > >> other code to shift the maintenance burden"? > > > > I found myself writing some code which needs to get dublin core data > > from > > content and should work for both zope3 and zope2 applications, except > > for the difference in interfaces. > > As you already found, the ICMFDublinCore should be supported by both, > right?
Except for the fact that no CMF (or AT) content type uses the zope.dublincore variant? ICMFDublinCore is also much more than I'm interested in - IDCTimes is all I need. Wichert. -- Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> It is simple to make things. http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple. _______________________________________________ Zope-CMF maillist - [email protected] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests
