Previously Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> On Sep 23, 2008, at 19:19 , Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > Previously Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
> >> On Sep 23, 2008, at 17:01 , Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> >>> Are there any objections to making the CMFCore interfaces derived
> >>> classes from zope.dublincore, or possibly even using those directly
> >>> where possible?
> >> Do you see any specific benefit, more than just "replace our code
> >> with
> >> other code to shift the maintenance burden"?
> > I found myself writing some code which needs to get dublin core data
> > from
> > content and should work for both zope3 and zope2 applications, except
> > for the difference in interfaces.
> As you already found, the ICMFDublinCore should be supported by both,
Except for the fact that no CMF (or AT) content type uses the
zope.dublincore variant? ICMFDublinCore is also much more than I'm
interested in - IDCTimes is all I need.
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple.
Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org
See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests