Previously Charlie Clark wrote:
> Am 02.03.2009 um 19:46 schrieb Hanno Schlichting:
> > This can happen in two ways, though. Either move the example- 
> > application
> > bits into a different package or move the reusable bits into one. If  
> > you
> > are really interested in doing this work, I'd be happy to figure out
> > what parts of CMFDefault Plone is actually using.
> I think this is essential. While I maintain the CMFDefault is an  
> excellent start for many websites, Plone should not be *directly*  
> dependent upon it - there are just too many conceptional differences  
> and by now also too many stylistic ones as well.


This goes in two ways: some bits of CMFCore should probably be in
CMFDefault as well.


Wichert Akkerman <>    It is simple to make things.                   It is hard to make things simple.
Zope-CMF maillist  -

See for bug reports and feature requests

Reply via email to