Previously Charlie Clark wrote:
> Am 02.03.2009 um 19:46 schrieb Hanno Schlichting:
> > This can happen in two ways, though. Either move the example-
> > application
> > bits into a different package or move the reusable bits into one. If
> > you
> > are really interested in doing this work, I'd be happy to figure out
> > what parts of CMFDefault Plone is actually using.
> I think this is essential. While I maintain the CMFDefault is an
> excellent start for many websites, Plone should not be *directly*
> dependent upon it - there are just too many conceptional differences
> and by now also too many stylistic ones as well.
This goes in two ways: some bits of CMFCore should probably be in
CMFDefault as well.
Wichert Akkerman <wich...@wiggy.net> It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple.
Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org
See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests