Hash: SHA1

yuppie wrote:
> Hi!
> Martin Aspeli wrote:
>> Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
>>> I'll look at CMFCore and CMFDefault over the next few days (I'm  
>>> traveling). Are there any code changes that you still need or is the  
>>> current trunk state ready to be released from your point of view?
>> I haven't looked into it in great detail, but from what I can tell, 
>> these things are al stable. Yuppie would know best, though.
> There are 2 issues I'd like to see resolved before a beta is released:
> 1.) look up add view actions in a different way
> -----------------------------------------------
> The current implementation is not flexible enough. There is no way to 
> sort or group these actions.
> This is on my todo list, but I still have to write a proposal.

Hmm, I don't recall the issue here.

> 2.) get rid of redundant type info properties
> ---------------------------------------------
> See http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-cmf/2009-January/028059.html
> Unfortunately nobody seems to feel responsible for this.
> We also should decide when to switch from zope.formlib to z3c.form. I 
> have no ambitions to maintain zope.formlib based code for a long time. 
> If we make Zope 2.12 the required platform for CMF 2.2 we can easily add 
> z3c.form to the dependencies and refactor existing forms.

I'm actually uncomfortable with either dependency.

> Or we could 
> move the forms and other views to a separate package. That way 
> CMFDefault would not depend on zope.formlib nor on z3c.form.

I would favor the latter.  cmf.forms, maybe?

- --
Tres Seaver          +1 540-429-0999          tsea...@palladion.com
Palladion Software   "Excellence by Design"    http://palladion.com
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

Zope-CMF maillist  -  Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org

See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests

Reply via email to