-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 3/31/10 22:07 , Tres Seaver wrote: > Jens Vagelpohl wrote: >> On 3/31/10 20:33 , Tres Seaver wrote: >>> I also don't know why the 'instance' and 'i18n*' parts are configured in >>> these buildouts -- does somebody have a memory of why, or a reason to >>> keep them? >> The "instance" part is a pure convenience to quickly fire up an instance >> if I need to look at something in the ZMI while doing development. If >> there's no pressing reason to remove it I'd really like to keep it. > > I can see leaving that alone for the trunk-on-trunk buildout: do you > need it for the buildouts used to test against other Zope versions? > The extra clutter and build time seems untidy to me.
I'm surprised that you want to remove it. I use it for all buildout combinations. How do you start an instance while doing work on CMF proper? Or do you never need any ZMI access or test portal instances? Do you manually create a separate buildout extending CMF.buildout? IMHO that would be a needless obstancle as opposed to keeping the "instance" part. jens -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkuzsGoACgkQRAx5nvEhZLJSDQCfV6Gue1BBSzQwrj0qd41ecAJ3 1pkAoKzOzmnYUxX6D6h6HnvFYahnVm+6 =3lsZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests