Am 21.04.2010, 12:57 Uhr, schrieb Charlie Clark <[email protected]>:
> Additionally I'd like to rename the view folder/@@edit.html to > folder/@@contents.html. I kept the view name to match the PythonScript > but > I think it is both misleading - you cannot "edit" the folder with this > view and it causes problems with classes derived from PortalFolder which > are contentish (a not unusual or unreasonable thing but which currently > forces a new name for an edit view or some hacking to have a dedicated > contents view). Apart from updating the profiles and, presumably, an > upgrade step I don't see any side-effects. aagh! wrong again! edit -> @@properties.html, folder_contents -> @@edit.html Gets me every time! I can just about live with "edit" referring to the metadata view although this is different from all other content objects but I'd prefer folders not to have edit views unless dedicated ones exist. Do we need an edit view to conform with actions/object? Charlie -- Charlie Clark Managing Director Clark Consulting & Research German Office Helmholtzstr. 20 Düsseldorf D- 40215 Tel: +49-211-600-3657 Mobile: +49-178-782-6226 _______________________________________________ Zope-CMF maillist - [email protected] https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests
