Zopista wrote: > > Hear, hear. The cost of the incremental cataloguing is horrific. One of our > developers when we started with Zope a year ago wrote a great script that > imported a bunch, restarted zope, packed it, restarted it, imported a bunch > more to get optimal performance. We dont do it like that any more ;) Doesn't the new catalog/btree implementation fix this? cheers, Chris _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
- [Zope-dev] 27 million objects. Erik Enge
- Re: [Zope-dev] 27 million objects. Michael R. Bernstein
- Re: [Zope-dev] 27 million objects. Andy McKay
- Re: [Zope-dev] 27 million objects. Erik Enge
- Re: [Zope-dev] 27 million objects. Zopista
- Re: [Zope-dev] 27 million objects. Chris Withers
- Re: [Zope-dev] 27 million objects. Andy McKay
- Re: [Zope-dev] 27 million objects. Andy McKay
- Re: [Zope-dev] 27 million objects. Chris McDonough
- Re: [Zope-dev] 27 million objects. Chris Withers
- Re: [Zope-dev] 27 million objects. Chris Withers
- Re: [Zope-dev] 27 million objects. Michael R. Bernstein
- Re: [Zope-dev] 27 million objects. Chris McDonough
- Re: [Zope-dev] 27 million objects. Andy McKay
- Re: [Zope-dev] 27 million objects. Sin Hang Kin
- Re: [Zope-dev] 27 million objects. Erik Enge
