Andy McKay wrote:
>
> Any cataloguing and un-cataloguing of an object is expensive, c'mon you are
> changing all the indices, vocabulary and so on.
Yup...
> You never notice it normally
> for 1 - 10 things, but run an import script of 10000 and catalog each object
> as it gets added (rather than all of them at the end) and you'll notice the
> difference. (This script was cataloguing 250,000 mail messages, one at a
> time. Big no-no)
Hmmm... I see your point now, and I think it's along the lines of "indexing
250,000 objects is slow, it's just when you take the performance hit".
Correct?
If so, then I don't really understand:
> Hear, hear. The cost of the incremental cataloguing is horrific.
How does this cost differ from non-incremenetal cataloguig?
Erm... actually... what is non-incremental cataloguing and how do you do it?
cheers,
Chris
_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
