On Friday 18 July 2003 01:29 pm, Dieter Maurer wrote: > Anthony Baxter wrote at 2003-7-18 15:14 +1000: > > > > >>> Andreas Jung wrote > > > I agree but the current implementation sux. Switching to a counter based > > > solution would solve the problem. The only problem I see is to keep the > > > code fully backward compatible. > > > > if there's no counter present: > > create one, do a count of the docs, initialise the counter > > We can use the size of the "_unindex". > > > However, is it really worth it? > > "#objects" suggests that it is the number of objects indexed by > this index. Who is interested in this information? > > Unless one has inhomogeous objects, almost all objects are indexed > by every index. Thus, "#objects" is likely to be similar for > many indexes. > > A much more interesting information would be the size of the index measured > by the number of index terms.
I agree. and as a plus, its a minor change to the software... -Casey _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )