On Thu, 6 May 2004, Andreas Jung wrote: > --On Donnerstag, 6. Mai 2004 12:37 Uhr +0100 Chris Withers > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Ken Manheimer wrote: > > > >> Done. The piece you were missing is that the categories are actually > >> states in the collector_issue_workflow. I added a "Wontfix" state and a > >> "refuse" transition (bringing to a total of three the transitions by > >> which issues are dodged:), and hooked them into the existing lattice. > > > > Yay! Does this mean we have a fully functional "wont fix" state now? > > A state we_can_live_with_that would be fine as well :-)
That's either "Reject" or "Defer" with "We can live with that (/for now)." body. I can envision a little action qualifier text box, where the supporter can put in a brief message that describes the reason for their action. It would (in my fantasy vision) have an accompanying select box that is populated with the catalog-collected uniqueValuesFor() for that action. (Javascript would jam the values in the select box when the supporter picks an action, from the selections for all the available actions prepopulated in a hidden field). This way the supporter could add a new reason, if none of the conventional (already-in-use) ones suit. While i love this prospect - fits my ideal of adaptive collaboration - i'm not sure the extra precision outweighs the extra complexity - and who has time to implement this, anyway?-) Ken _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
