On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 13:02 +0100, Chris Withers wrote: > >> Would anyone object if I wrote tests and changed the implementation to > >> raise exceptions, including Unauthorized, instead of returning None? > > > > Unauthorized in getObject is out of the question, that would be new > > behaviour. > > Well, in 2.8, new behaviour is expected, right? > I really passionately believe that we should not be returnining None in > Zope 2.8, and since 2.8 hasn't quite hit beta yet I'm very keen to see > it fixed asap. > > Any objections?
No, I agree that it should raise Unauthorized. Just make sure that this is communicated properly at release time. -- Roch� Compaan Upfront Systems http://www.upfrontsystems.co.za _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [email protected] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
