On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 13:02 +0100, Chris Withers wrote:
> >> Would anyone object if I wrote tests and changed the implementation to
> >> raise exceptions, including Unauthorized, instead of returning None?
> > Unauthorized in getObject is out of the question, that would be new
> > behaviour.
> Well, in 2.8, new behaviour is expected, right?
> I really passionately believe that we should not be returnining None in
> Zope 2.8, and since 2.8 hasn't quite hit beta yet I'm very keen to see
> it fixed asap.
> Any objections?
No, I agree that it should raise Unauthorized. Just make sure that this
is communicated properly at release time.
Upfront Systems http://www.upfrontsystems.co.za
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -