Paul Winkler wrote:
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 11:47:13AM -0400, Chris McDonough wrote:
I think that's the sanest policy. So it's OK if "bullshit" gets called on people putting deprecation warnings into any .1, .2, etc through .9 releases, then? This seems like the only thing that can work. We can't expect people to upgrade to stable point releases (e.g. 2.8.5 from 2.8.4 or earlier) just to be able to see deprecation warnings.

That makes perfect sense to me.
+1 to no new deprecation warnings in stable third-dot releases.

+1 to that too. No new deprecation warnings outside feature releases.


Zope-Dev maillist  -
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - )

Reply via email to