On 28 Jun 2007, at 17:03 , Andreas Zeidler wrote:
On Jun 25, 2007, at 10:05 AM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
On 21 Jun 2007, at 23:47 , Andreas Zeidler wrote:
On Jun 21, 2007, at 9:07 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
ah, here it is: http://svn.zope.org/?rev=76408&view=rev should fix
the zclasses problem, if i'm not totally mistaken.

That change needs backporting, I think, to the ZODB 3.6 line (for 2.9)
and 3.7 line (for 2.10).

true, but i think philipp was only asking about 2.11 for the time being. i agree the fix should be backported, though. i'd even volunteer to do it, if nobody else wants to... :)

That would be great, especially since we're on the verge of new maintenance releases for 2.9 and 2.10.

i did the backporting of jim's fix[1] to the 3.6 and 3.7 branches of zodb this morning and created two branches[2,3] of zope 2.9 and 2.10 with no further changes except the updated externals (pointing at the zodb branches, of course). all tests are passing, that is for the zodb branches as well as for both zope branches, and especially for zclasses, run individually and together with all other tests.

so i reckon the fix could go into the next releases of 2.9 and 2.10, provided they are using new releases of zodb 3.6 and 3.7 in turn. plenty of work for andreas, i guess... :)

If I know Andreas he won't do ZODB releases... So, apart from updating version.txt, CHANGES.txt, etc. and making a tag, I don't think there would be much else to a ZODB release... *wink* :)

Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to