On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 11:45:10 -0800, Malthe Borch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-1 to magic or weak dependencies.
+1 to "test what you fly and fly what you test"
I agree. In this case it would make sense to have five.jbot. If
everyone's in favor, I can split it out like that. It's an interesting
situation though because the package in question does not have any
code that depends on zope 2 in any way.
While we're on a renaming spree here, why "jbot"? (I know, Just a Bunch of
My associations go to IRC or spam bots immediately. :)
Alexander Limi · http://limi.net
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -