On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 11:45:10 -0800, Malthe Borch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

-1 to magic or weak dependencies.
+1 to "test what you fly and fly what you test"

I agree. In this case it would make sense to have five.jbot. If
everyone's in favor, I can split it out like that. It's an interesting
situation though because the package in question does not have any
code that depends on zope 2 in any way.

While we're on a renaming spree here, why "jbot"? (I know, Just a Bunch of Templates)

My associations go to IRC or spam bots immediately. :)

Alexander Limi ยท http://limi.net

Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to