On Sep 2, 2008, at 10:38 AM, Stephan Richter wrote:

> On Tuesday 02 September 2008, Jim Fulton wrote:
>>> This whould not affect other implementations like
>>> the ISourceQueriables etc. It only offers the
>>> a way to implement reusable simple ISource components
>>> without the need that every UI framework needs to
>>> implement their own interfaces for query ISource
>>> component in their own way (e.g. ITerms).
>> Why can't they use zope.app.form.interfaces.ITerms
> Because it makes every project that uses sources in a meaningful way  
> depend on
> zope.app.form, which has a lot of dependencies that I do not want. It
> prohibits another form framework, such as z3c.form  to not depend on
> zope.app.form, which suck to say the least. :-)
> An alternative to Roger's proposal would be to move the ITerms  
> declaration and
> any possible generic implementation of such into its own package  
> zope.terms.

I don't have a problem with that. :)


Jim Fulton
Zope Corporation

Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to