Hey Andreas, Andreas Jung wrote:
> There are basically two options: create a dedicated microsite (similar > to grok.zope.org) or follow the Zope 3 approach on wiki.zope.org. Unless > someone provides enough resources in helping, I would like to go with > the wiki approach since it is much easier to handle. Volunteers that > have the same interest in Zope 2 and getting this thing done are invited > to join the effort. I'm really happy about this initiative. I really hope someone provides the resources to create a microsite instead of "the Zope 3 approach on wiki.zope.org". Grok is doing two things: a Plone-based site where people can contribute documentation, and a Sphinx-based website for official documentation maintained in SVN. The Zope 3 approach on wiki.zope.org is hardly a shining example of web presence for a web framework that's attractive to users. I'd say overall it's an anti-example (though it's has much improved compared to what it was before - as of quite recently it chased users away saying it was really a site for the developers of Zope 3). Hearing of plans to replicate its approach therefore worry me a little. :) Anyway, overall I'm a big supporter of the "microsite" approach. It's the only approach that actually got us to new web sites over the last years. Regards, Martijn _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [email protected] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
