On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 05:14, Martin Aspeli <[email protected]> wrote: > The new.zope.org initiative died because no-one could write any content. > Even then 5-10 pages of content requires for a very basic microsite was > too much, and several separate calls for volunteers produced almost no > actual content, even if several people showed an interest.
Where did you ask for volunteers? I don't remember seeing in on zope-web, but I could have missed it or just forgot. My attitude has always been, and is still: Build it and they will come. We don't need content, we need a site. Besides, the current state is, and has for a long time been, almost worse than having no site at all, and definitely worse than having a couple of microsites even if these have almost no content. > Another observation: the thing that most people seem to want to make a > site about was the ZODB. We nearly had enough content for a ZODB > microsite thanks to Christian Theune and a few others. If there is one page, then that's enough. Hence, there should have been a zodb.zope.org by now. -- Lennart Regebro: Pythonista, Barista, Notsotrista. http://regebro.wordpress.com/ +33 661 58 14 64 _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [email protected] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
