Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Okay, in the interests of making this discussion go quickly, there has
> been enough negative feedback about renaming Zope 2 to think we have no
> realistic chance of renaming it.
> We are still stuck with the following perceived sequence:
> Zope 2, Zope 3
> which implies that people should want to upgrade.
Does it? There's precedence for systems where n and n+1 does not
represent a linear upgrade path.
The '3' says more "if you're starting afresh, this is where you want to
start". I think that's still a correct statement.
> If we don't call Zope Framework "4.0", we'll be fine. We should call its
> first release 1.0 and there's no implication of a progression.
Yes. For the love of God, please don't call "the Zope Framework" 4.0!
Author of `Professional Plone Development`, a book for developers who
want to work with Plone. See http://martinaspeli.net/plone-book
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -