On Apr 8, 2009, at 11:40 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Okay, in the interests of making this discussion go quickly, there has
> been enough negative feedback about renaming Zope 2 to think we have
> realistic chance of renaming it.
> We are still stuck with the following perceived sequence:
> Zope 2, Zope 3
> which implies that people should want to upgrade.
That is a problem we ought to fix, IMO.
> How to get out of that bind? We could consider renaming Zope 3. Is
> any potential for this?
I think we should call the Zope 3 application "ZDecoy". The rest of
Zope 3, the parts everyone uses, is covered by "Zope Framework".
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -