Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> This is part of the whole named template adapter story. The rationale
> for the whole story is to be able to replace the template of a view
> without touching the view. So the template is looked up as an adapter
> and not just accessed as self.index / self.template. Personally I find
> the whole feature just annoying and overcomplicated. I think the whole
> feature is due for removal. It's only used in a very minor number of
> cases and not consistently with views in general.

Could you comment on the discussion I've had with Michael Howitz 
elsewhere in this thread about this then? I think this relates to the 
whole z3c.template and zope.formlib discussion.

[suggestion to invert the dependency between zope.formlib and zope.app.form]

Ah, great minds...



Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to