Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> This is part of the whole named template adapter story. The rationale
> for the whole story is to be able to replace the template of a view
> without touching the view. So the template is looked up as an adapter
> and not just accessed as self.index / self.template. Personally I find
> the whole feature just annoying and overcomplicated. I think the whole
> feature is due for removal. It's only used in a very minor number of
> cases and not consistently with views in general.
Could you comment on the discussion I've had with Michael Howitz
elsewhere in this thread about this then? I think this relates to the
whole z3c.template and zope.formlib discussion.
[suggestion to invert the dependency between zope.formlib and zope.app.form]
Ah, great minds...
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -