On Jul 4, 2009, at 8:41 PM, Chris McDonough wrote: > On 7/4/09 7:55 PM, Stephan Richter wrote: >> On Saturday 04 July 2009, Christian Theune wrote: >>> I took the Zope 3.4 KGS, removed the obvious packages that do not >>> belong >>> to the ZTK out of the list and created a home for the master list >>> that >>> defines which packages belong to the ZTK. >>> >>> It's in the Zope toolkit documentation: >>> http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/about/packages.html >>> >>> So, if you see that a package is missing or is classified in the >>> wrong >>> way, then please speak up. >> >> To be honest, I am very disappointed by this list. It is totally >> meaningless >> to me since it does not represent any list with which I can build >> even a >> fairly simple application today. There is not a single z3c package >> in there. > > Maybe not surprisingly I have the opposite feeling. To me, it's > already a > pretty large set of "definite" packages (~60), and a definitely > large set of > "definite" + "under review" packages (~120). Are we going to be > able to > maintain all that software over time?
Yes > If we do, will we have time to do > anything else? Yes. Generally, these packages should require very little maintenance. They've gotten a lot recently to try to reduce dependencies, but I don't think they'll need much going forward. Jim -- Jim Fulton Zope Corporation _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
